Academic integrity and authenticity controls in AI-era
90 minutes
Online Webinar
Integrated – Intermediate
$95.00
September 15, 2026
12:30 pm AEST
Javier Amaro Castillo
AI has changed the assessment risk profile for every RTO. Trainers and assessors now need practical controls to confirm that student evidence is genuine, sufficient and defensible before making competency judgements.
This 90-minute live webinar gives your team a frontline implementation model for managing AI-era academic integrity, closing evidence gaps, and reducing non-compliance exposure under the Standards for RTOs 2025.
Why Authenticity Fails in Audits
Authenticity failures do not usually start with obvious misconduct. They start when assessment systems rely on declarations, assumptions, generic plagiarism checks and assessor intuition instead of documented verification controls.
Under the 2025 Outcome Standards, the issue is direct: assessment evidence must support competency judgements. If assessors cannot demonstrate how they verified authenticity, the RTO is exposed to evidence gaps, validation failures and ASQA scrutiny.
Common risk points include:
Student declarations used as the primary authenticity control
Assessment tasks that are easy to outsource, copy or generate using AI
Written submissions accepted without oral verification or practical triangulation
Inconsistent assessor responses to suspected AI-generated evidence
Weak documentation of authenticity checks and assessor rationale
Validation practices that do not test AI-era assessment integrity risks
Competency decisions based on polished evidence that may not reflect actual competence
AI detectors are not an assessment system. RTOs need defensible controls that sit inside assessment design, assessor practice, validation and self-assurance.
What This Webinar Will Help You Achieve
This webinar moves trainers and assessors from uncertainty to controlled practice. The focus is not AI awareness; it is assessment defensibility, evidence integrity and practical judgement control.
You will be able to identify where AI-generated evidence creates audit exposure and apply structured checks before making assessment decisions. You will also be able to document authenticity concerns in a way that supports fairness, transparency and defensible assessor judgement.
This will enable your RTO to:
- Strengthen compliance with the rules of evidence, particularly authenticity and sufficiency
- Reduce inconsistent judgement across trainers and assessors
- Improve evidence triangulation across written, oral, practical and third-party sources
- Apply clearer decision rules when AI use is suspected
- Support validation with stronger evidence of assessment integrity controls
- Build more reliable records for audit, complaints, appeals and internal review
What You Will Take Back to Your RTO
The value of this webinar is immediate implementation. Trainers and assessors will leave with practical tools that can be applied to current assessment practice without waiting for a full system redesign.
You will take back:
An AI-era authenticity risk checklist for assessment evidence
A permitted vs prohibited AI-use model for assessment instructions
A red-flag indicator guide for potentially non-authentic submissions
An oral verification question structure to confirm student ownership
An evidence triangulation model for defensible competency decisions
A documentation framework for recording authenticity checks and assessor rationale
A validation trigger guide for identifying samples that require deeper review
These resources help trainers and assessors make cleaner decisions, document their rationale, and reduce the risk of weak evidence being accepted as competent performance.
Who This Webinar Is For
This webinar is designed for the people closest to the assessment risk. Trainers and assessors are the control point between submitted evidence and the competency judgement.
Primary Audience
This session is most relevant for:
RTO trainers delivering nationally recognised training
Assessors making competency judgements
Lead assessors responsible for consistency and moderation
Trainers working in online, blended or high-volume assessment environments
Secondary Audience
The session will also support managers and quality personnel who oversee assessment integrity, validation and compliance performance.
Relevant stakeholders include:
Training managers
Compliance managers
Instructional designers
Validation team members
RTO managers responsible for assessment quality
How the Session Is Delivered
This is a focused, implementation-led webinar. It connects the Standards for RTOs 2025 to real assessment scenarios where AI use, authenticity concerns and evidence quality are now operational risks.
The session uses practical examples, control points and guided application so participants can see how authenticity checks should work inside day-to-day assessment practice.
The webinar includes:
- Live expert facilitation
- Practical examples of AI-era authenticity risk
- Demonstration of evidence verification controls
- Examples of oral verification and evidence triangulation
- Templates and checklists for workplace use
- Guided reflection on current assessment weaknesses
- Q&A focused on real RTO implementation issues
Implementation Model: Learning → Application → Impact
This webinar is built around a simple implementation pathway. The outcome is not awareness; it is stronger assessment control.
Learning
Trainers and assessors build capability in AI-era authenticity risk, evidence verification, assessor judgement and documentation.
Application
Within 30–90 days, your RTO can implement clearer AI-use instructions, structured verification questions, authenticity checklists and escalation practices.
Impact
The RTO strengthens assessment defensibility, reduces evidence gaps, improves assessor consistency and creates stronger records for validation, audit and self-assurance.
Why This Matters Under the 2025 Standards
The 2025 Standards increase the pressure on RTOs to demonstrate outcome-based compliance through evidence, not assumptions. AI has raised the integrity risk, but it has not changed the obligation to make accurate and defensible assessment judgements.
RTOs must be able to show that their assessment system is fit-for-purpose, that evidence supports competency decisions, and that assessors have reasonable assurance that the evidence is the student’s own work.
This matters now because:
- AI-generated submissions can conceal weak competence
- Generic plagiarism controls do not provide sufficient assurance
- Assessment authenticity is now a frontline compliance risk
- Validation must respond to emerging evidence integrity risks
- Poor documentation increases exposure during ASQA scrutiny
- Weak authenticity controls can undermine qualification integrity
Protect assessment authenticity before it becomes an audit finding.
AI-generated evidence is already affecting assessment practice. RTOs that wait for a validation failure, complaint, appeal or audit finding will be responding after the risk has matured.
This 90-minute live webinar gives trainers and assessors practical controls they can implement immediately to verify student evidence, strengthen competency judgements and reduce non-compliance exposure under the Standards for RTOs 2025.
Register Now